I know you believe that the EO muscles are involved, but the reality is that your eye was not measured before and after you used the method to see what changed. We don’t know if your lens size or position changed, cornea changed or axial length changed. No measures of structural rigidity were done. No measures of EO muscle strength, atrophy etc were done. The “muscle” feeling could be anything, you can’t know whether it is EO muscles you feel or something else.
It really doesn’t matter whether the axial length of the eye changes or not. I believe that is what happens and I believe a spherical reading of plano on my last prescription indicates that is the case, but it doesn’t matter. What matters is that I have proposed a model that explains everything that occurred to me in the vision improvement process. It is a model that explains what is required to restore vision to normal and the difficulty involved depending on vision history. There is no other explanation so by default it must stand. As you have said, permanent changes in the lens is impossible and I believe the same is true of the cornea. It is the only plausible explanation.
This would not even be a question if more participants in this site were reactivating this powerful mechanism.
I agree that there seems to have been more interest in speculating about the “why it worked” rather than on “how to do it”. Your method does not depend on why it works and I think your insistance on your idea about why as led to a lot of back and forth about the “why” instead of the “how”. I think when you first posted the method that I suggested you ditch the “why” explanation and simply focus on an explanation of how the do the various activities. I have not changed my mind on that.
The why is important, however, because no one can begin the method and later say “I didn’t think this would be so hard.” It is difficult because you are reshaping the eye back to spherical (right or wrong). It may not even be possible for some. That is why so few are succeeding with the method. Most seem to get stuck on the reactivation phase which is a by far the easiest and yet the most important phase of the method.
Place your comment